tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21339754.post5362255629724548658..comments2023-10-26T06:15:51.387-07:00Comments on Load Code: Go vs JavaAdam Smithhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05862497628924727350noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21339754.post-39470679957705071962014-05-23T11:50:00.231-07:002014-05-23T11:50:00.231-07:00I just found out about Go.
It seems somewhat redun...I just found out about Go.<br />It seems somewhat redundant not to mention no so feasible given the vast frameworks and utilities available in Java jars today.<br />Java is still considered a safe (Pointer wise) and flexible language.<br />Through annotations many technologies become instantly manageable. <br />(1)How does Go hope to compete with that. How can Go be so fast to develop except perhaps for the interpreter capabilities much like javascript?<br />(2) How convertable is C++ or Java to Go through automation including handling annotations in existing code? <br />(3) Is this at all possible?Perry Rhodanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17871603347270071556noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21339754.post-18079046963791673292011-04-07T09:43:15.280-07:002011-04-07T09:43:15.280-07:00Object-oriented programming creates an illusion of...Object-oriented programming creates an illusion of more power by adding structure (removing flexibility) as we as humane cannot comprehend linear programming to it's full extent.<br /><br />I do dislike Java, however your arguments are obscenely off-target. Java's purpose is not flexibility; is not to do things in less code. It accomplishes the opposite -- making it much easier to read TypicalBadProgrammer1's code in an enterprise of many many TypicalBadProgrammers.<br /><br />Any statement you've made about how Java requires more code or that Go has a slightly nicer syntax is so worthless to say. Additionally your comment on ActionListener needing to be defined is false as Java does support absolute class paths.<br /><br />Want a real argument against Java? It's a pile of garbage seemingly built on the foundation of a "can it be done?" experiment with additional garbage constantly be stapled on. Perhaps it's part of the 'beauty' of Java for the capacity to receive such stapled garbage. Regardless, Java doesn't come close to the potential staring it in the eyes. Many inconsistencies such as singular return types and ambiguous parameters begs the question "did anyone actually THINK about this?".<br /><br />Java is great when it's programmer is a collective of people-who-hate-their-jobs-on-average. The resulting code is even comparably fast in such situations. Beyond that, it's as useless to the world now as the Saturn IB, and people should just learn to program already.MrAppleshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12517759746023147421noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21339754.post-90309773089313532522010-09-15T19:28:31.051-07:002010-09-15T19:28:31.051-07:00Nice article. I hope more people experiment with ...Nice article. I hope more people experiment with Go; I've certainly enjoyed the various little coding projects I've done with it.<br /><br />Minor note: you can omit most of the end-of-line semicolons in your Go code, since they are inferred. This makes the visual comparison to Java even more striking. Also consider running the Go code through a syntax highlighter.Sameer Ajmanihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02661840849185378352noreply@blogger.com